|
Democrats: Remember the Lessons of 2004 Even today, two days after the election and just a day after John
Kerry's concession speech, Democrats are already openly speculating
about the prospects of a 2008 White House run by Hillary Clinton.
While this may confirm in some measure, the conspiracy theorist claim
that the Clintons were hoping (and in unseen ways, working against)
still-Senator John Kerry's campaign, it also leads one to wonder what,
if anything, the Party of the Ass has learned from the horsewhipping
administered to it by the American electorate just 48 hours ago.
While I, like most conservatives, celebrated wins in the race for the
White House, victories that strengthened House and Senate Republican
majorities and still more governor's offices in the hands of
conservatives, I'm an American first. And because of that, I think it's
important that those to the left of center take a long hard look at the
lessons American voters wrote in the election results of Nov. 2. It's
important because, while I hold conservative values and policies dear, I
believe a weak Democratic party can only lead to a weak Republican party
(and, of course, vice versa). After all, good competition benefits all.
So, what did the American Electorate tell us Nov. 2?
First, that it places great value on values. George Bush took a clear
and certain position on every question or issue that came his way not
only during the just-ended campaign, but since the day he took the Oath
of Office in January 2001. You may have forgotten, but in the days and
weeks preceding 9/11, he took a firm position on stem cell research.
While the wreckage of the World Trade Center was still smoldering, he
told Americans and the entire world that he would bring the full force
of the U.S. military and its resources to bear on the bearded fanatics
of the Muslim world. What's more, he made it plain that states who
supported terrorists in any way would be considered enemies of the U.S.
No longer would two-bit tyrants in Muslim countries thumb their noses at
the U.S. with impunity. Sadaam called Bush's bluff. Muammar Qaddafi
didn't.
Bush's other positions were every bit as clear. Bush opposed gay
marriage. Bush supported tax cuts. Bush, rightly or wrongly, supported a
guest worker program for illegal aliens. Bush supported the use of the
PATRIOT act. Bush opposed abortion. All clear, all certain.
Kerry, on the other hand, tried to win voters by taking something of
every position on nearly every issue. His many flip flops certainly need
not be repeated here; we've all heard scores of them ad nauseum for the
past six months. Kerry had no expressed values, and it cost him the
votes of those who wanted to know what they were.
Second, while American voters on the whole, do not bear any ill will
toward gay, lesbian, transgendered, cross-dressers, those questioning
their orientation, or what have you, they also do not feel they should
be forced to place the societal stamp of approval that is marriage on
the many lifestyles that make up the confused rainbow of those who
choose to identify themselves chiefly by their sexual preferences. In
short, you can dress like a Druid and spend your afternoons with
transgendered midgets in bath houses, but don't seek to have society
give the same formal acknowledgement to that relationship as it does to
traditional marriages, which human society has formally sanctioned for
about 5,000 years. Once again, voters supported strongly several
measures banning gay marriage. The idea of gay marriage has been
pummeled by U.S. voters at every turn. Clearly, further pursuit of this
issue only seeks to widen the divide between mainstream Americans and
the Bath House Party, which is counter to their stated goals of merely
seeking acceptance. You have acceptance, but you've no right to expect
approval.
Third, put some distance between yourselves and the Michael Moore wing
of the Democratic party. Certainly, the pseudo-intelligentsia of the
entertainment industry sprained a few elbows clapping one another on the
back after the screening of Fahrenheit 9-11, and after screeds by Sean
Penn and intellectual heavyweights such as Leonardo DiCrapio, Natalie
Maines, Rosie O'Donnell and the rest of the People Magazine crowd. But
most Americans don't buy it, and don't identify with this bunch. Most
Americans can't afford to vacation regularly in every popular tourist
haven on earth. Most can't afford to have three kids, one by an
ex-spouse, another by an ex-boyfriend and third solo, through invitro
fertilization. Most Americans can't completely flop at work one day and
wake up to a host of multi-million dollar job offers the next. Jennifer
Lopez makes "Gigli," sees it turn into an utter failure financially and
presumably artistically, and then spends months sorting through a series
of new movie offers. That's not the real world. While the lefties loved
to listen to the Hollywood crowd snipe at George W. Bush, those of us
who recognize the entertainment world and those who populate it as
escapist didn't. We knew better than to confuse this world and the
opinions of those who live it in to drive our real world decisions at
the polls.
Fourth, look at the map. The election map was truly astounding. Kerry
took New England, a traditional strong ground for liberals, and the Left
Coast. In between was a sea of red states, dotted only by the leftist
bastions of Wisconsin, Minnesota and Illinois (which is dominated by
Chicago's Democratic machine). If the dems want to Hillary to be
competitive in 2008, they'd better help her learn what people in the
Midwest, the South, the southwest, the north central and the west value
and consider priorities. Clearly, apart from the three aforementioned
liberal enclaves, the message of the dems was rejected by most of the
U.S.
Fifth, don't count on the media to do your dirty work. Americans could
tolerate the liberal bias of the media, until the mainstream media began
to act on its urges to influence the election. Dan Rather's memogate,
the overblown coverage of the Abu Graib prisoner hazing, the Missing
Explosives controversy and endless other "Bush is screwing up" stories
crossed the line. The price was an American electorate that shot back at
the press, and more important, a total loss of credibility for the likes
of Rather, Brokaw, Jennings, the New York Times, etc.
Sixth, play fair. Reports of plans for rioting in the streets of New
York during the GOP convention, stealing Bush Cheney signs, slashing
tires on vehicles used by Republican campaign workers, break-ins and
vandalism of Republican campaign offices aren't merely the acts of
overenthusiastic campaign workers. These are initial steps on the road
to fascism. (Funny how the left likes to hurl that very word at
Republicans).
Certainly there's more, but that's a good start.
So, to summarize in the tradition of Dana Carvey's best George H.W. Bush
caricature:
- Take consistent positions.
- Get out of bed with the "LGBT" crowd.
- Stay out of Michael Moore's bed (there's no room left anyway).
- Visit Kansas City, Des Moines or Lubbock. When you get there, listen and don't talk.
- Dan Rather's going to retire—for good reason.
- Play nice—the ends don't justify the means.
2004-11-04
|